The Recuyell Of The Historyes Of Troye

8 min read

The Recuyell of the Historyes of Troye stands as a monumental landmark in the history of English literature and printing, representing the very first book ever printed in the English language. Produced by William Caxton in Bruges around 1473 or 1474, this volume is far more than a mere bibliographic curiosity; it is a bridge between the medieval manuscript tradition and the dawn of the print revolution, a translation that shaped the English vernacular, and a vessel carrying the foundational myths of Western civilization to a new audience. Understanding this work requires examining its tangled textual history, the remarkable figure of its translator-printer, and the specific cultural moment that demanded a Troy book in English.

The Textual Lineage: From Latin to French to English

The story of the Recuyell begins long before Caxton set his type. The core narrative derives from the Historia destructionis Troiae (History of the Destruction of Troy), a Latin prose romance written by Guido delle Colonne (Guido de Columnis), a Sicilian judge and poet, around 1287. Guido’s work was a serious, moralizing history attempting to strip the Trojan War of its "pagan" poetic embellishments—specifically the gods and goddesses of Homer and Virgil—replacing divine intervention with human psychology and political maneuvering. It became the standard medieval account of the war, circulating widely in manuscript form across Europe.

Counterintuitive, but true.

In the mid-15th century, the text crossed the linguistic border into French. Raoul Lefèvre, chaplain to Philip the Good, Duke of Burgundy, translated Guido’s Latin into French prose around 1464, titling it Le Recueil des Histoires de Troye. Here's the thing — lefèvre softened Guido’s austere tone, reintroducing some of the romance elements and courtly sensibilities favored by the Burgundian court. It was this French version—luxuriously illuminated and politically potent—that fell into the hands of William Caxton Worth keeping that in mind..

Caxton, then a merchant and diplomat serving Margaret of York, Duchess of Burgundy (sister to Edward IV of England), undertook the translation into English at her behest. Because of that, he began the work in 1468, abandoned it due to dissatisfaction with his own linguistic abilities, and resumed it in 1471, completing it in Cologne in 1471–72 before moving the printing operation to Bruges. The title The Recuyell of the Historyes of Troye is a direct Anglicization of Lefèvre’s French title, retaining the archaic spelling Recuyell (modern French Recueil, meaning a collection or compilation).

William Caxton: Merchant, Diplomat, and Pioneer Printer

To understand the book, one must understand the man. He served as Governor of the English Nation in Bruges, a position of significant commercial and diplomatic weight. Practically speaking, 1422–1491) was not a scholar cloistered in a scriptorium. Day to day, william Caxton (c. He was a successful merchant of the Mercers' Company, living in the Low Countries for over thirty years. His entry into printing was a business decision informed by his exposure to the new technology in Cologne, where he likely learned the craft at the press of Johann Veldener or Ulrich Zell Small thing, real impact..

The official docs gloss over this. That's a mistake.

Caxton’s motivation for printing the Recuyell was multifaceted. In practice, there was a clear market demand: the English nobility and gentry, increasingly distanced from French cultural dominance after the Hundred Years' War, hungered for vernacular literature. The Troy legend held specific political resonance; the English traced their lineage through Brutus, great-grandson of Aeneas, making the Fall of Troy effectively the pre-history of the British nation. By printing this specific text, Caxton provided the English ruling class with a "national epic" in their own tongue The details matter here..

His role as translator is equally critical. Caxton was acutely aware of the "rudeness" of English compared to the polished French of the Burgundian court. Practically speaking, he essentially forged a literary prose style, standardizing spelling and syntax at a time when English was a chaos of regional dialects. In his famous prologues and epilogues—often more revealing than the translation itself—he agonizes over vocabulary choices, defending his use of "homely" terms while striving for "rhetorical" elegance. The Recuyell is the first major evidence of this standardization process Practical, not theoretical..

The Physical Book: Incunabula and Typography

As an incunabulum (a book printed before 1501), the Recuyell is a masterpiece of early typography. On top of that, caxton used a Bastarda typeface (Type 1*), a blackletter script mimicking the formal Burgundian chancery hand used in luxury manuscripts. This was a deliberate marketing choice: it made the printed book look familiar and prestigious to buyers accustomed to handwritten volumes The details matter here. Still holds up..

The layout mirrors manuscript conventions: no title page (a later invention), dense columns of text, rubricated initials (often added by hand after printing), and explicit colophons. and finished in the holy city of Cologne... which book was translated... And it reads (in modernized spelling): "Thus endeth this book... The colophon of the Recuyell is historic in its own right. by me William Caxton... Also, in the year of our Lord MCCCCLXXI. " It is the first printer's colophon in English, establishing the convention of the printer taking public responsibility for the text.

Surviving copies—roughly 18 to 20 are known today—reveal the hybrid nature of early print. Still, others were on paper for the merchant class. Some copies were printed on vellum for wealthy patrons like Margaret of York, featuring hand-painted miniatures and borders indistinguishable from manuscripts. This duality captures the transitional moment: the Recuyell was a printed book designed to compete with, and eventually replace, the manuscript.

You'll probably want to bookmark this section.

Narrative Scope: The Matter of Troy

The content of the Recuyell covers the full "Matter of Troy," a narrative arc stretching from the founding of the city to the returns of the Greek heroes (Nostoi). Unlike Homer’s Iliad, which focuses on a few weeks in the tenth year, the Recuyell is a universal history.

Key episodes include:

  • The Foundation and Early Kings: The building of Troy by Apollo and Neptune, the reign of Laomedon, and the first sack of Troy by Hercules and Telamon.
  • The Embassy and the War: The failed diplomatic missions, the gathering of the Greek host at Aulis, and the ten-year siege.
  • The Judgment of Paris: The catalyst for the war, handled with courtly psychology rather than divine caprice. The love story of Troilus and Briseida (later Cressida) receives extensive treatment, forming the direct source for Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde and Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida.
  • Major Heroes: Detailed biographies of Hector, Achilles, Ajax, Ulysses, and Troilus. Here's the thing — * The Fall: The Wooden Horse, the sack of the city, the death of Priam, and the fates of the Trojan women (Hecuba, Polyxena, Andromache). * The Returns: The wanderings of Aeneas (linking to Virgil and the Roman/British foundation myth) and the tragic homecomings of Agamemnon and Menelaus.

No fluff here — just what actually works And that's really what it comes down to..

Caxton’s translation follows Lefèvre closely, meaning the gods are largely absent as active characters. Fate (Fortune) and human agency drive the plot. This rationalized approach made the pagan past palatable to Christian readers, framing the war as a moral lesson on the mutability of fortune and the consequences of lust and pride.

Linguistic Significance: Forging

of Standard English

Caxton’s linguistic choices in the Recuyell are a fascinating study in compromise and pragmatism. Words like "adventure," "chapel," "marchioness," and "pardon" entered the lexicon through his pages. On the flip side, his source text was a French translation by Raoul Lefèvre, and Caxton’s own translation is a vibrant, sometimes clumsy, blend of that French influence and the vernacular English he knew. Consider this: he didn't attempt a purist English; instead, he enriched the vocabulary by adapting French words, often creating new English terms in the process. His syntax sometimes retains the structure of French sentences, which can feel stilted to a modern reader but reveals the fluid boundaries between languages in the 15th century.

More significantly, Caxton’s preface to the reader is a landmark in the history of the English language. In it, he famously expresses his anxiety about the "great diversity" of English dialects, writing, "I suppose that comynly all Englysshe men wolde be ryght wroth yf they sholde be thus repreued... Which means for it is not Englysshe that is vsed here, but the comyn speche. " This passage is often cited as the first conscious attempt to define and promote a "standard" English, a written form that could transcend regional variations. The Recuyell, therefore, was not just a translation of a classical text but an active intervention in the evolution of the English tongue itself, helping to forge a written standard from a diverse spoken reality Small thing, real impact. Simple as that..

Legacy and Influence

The Recuyell of the Historyes of Troye holds a unique and foundational place in English letters. As Caxton’s first printed book, it was the inaugural volume in what would become the vast tradition of English printing. It proved the commercial viability of printing vernacular literature, paving the way for the dissemination of knowledge that would define the Renaissance. Its content, the Matter of Troy, ensured that classical mythology and heroic narrative remained a vital part of the English cultural imagination for centuries to come.

Its direct literary legacy is immeasurable. The detailed account of Troilus and Briseida provided the very scaffolding upon which Chaucer built his masterpiece, Troilus and Criseyde. Chaucer, in turn, was the primary source for Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida, making the Recuyell a distant but essential ancestor of one of Shakespeare’s greatest tragedies. What's more, by presenting a rationalized, moralized version of the Trojan story, Caxton’s work influenced a generation of readers and writers, embedding these archetypes of love, betrayal, and tragic fate deep into the English literary consciousness Not complicated — just consistent. Practical, not theoretical..

All in all, the Recuyell was far more than a mere curiosity of early printing. It was a bold commercial venture, a key linguistic statement, and a rich literary source that bridged the gap between the manuscript culture of the medieval period and the dynamic, word-hungry world of print. It stands as a testament to William Caxton’s vision—not just as a printer, but as a shaper of English language and literature, whose first book helped set the course for the nation's literary history Simple as that..

What's Just Landed

What's Just Gone Live

Explore More

Also Worth Your Time

Thank you for reading about The Recuyell Of The Historyes Of Troye. We hope the information has been useful. Feel free to contact us if you have any questions. See you next time — don't forget to bookmark!
⌂ Back to Home